Starship Troopers is hardly about aliens or fighting space bugs at all. It’s about Johnnie Rico, our narrator and protagonist, making his way through boot camp and officer training school in a future society run by the military, in which citizenship can only be gained through service.
It’s a weird book. It’s very readable and there are some fascinating discussions of the benefits of an orderly—and deeply fascistic—society. As an argument for a sort of “benign fascism” it’s troublingly convincing, though I find Heinlein’s Utopia rather terrifying if we’re being honest. I can see how others would find his arguments rather more convincing, which is exactly why they’re so disturbing.
Rico gets through boot camp and ends up on a ship as part of a unit called Rasczak’s Roughnecks, named after its lieutenant. (Later, as an officer-in-training he serves with Blackie’s Blackguards, a unit with a rather more awkward handle).
During his time with the Roughnecks and then the Blackguards, we get our only real taste of what the war with the Bugs is all about. The action is rather stilted. This was clearly not really what Heinlein was interested in. We get a lot of talk about how the Mobile Infantry troops are deployed. One of the biggest action scenes—when Rico takes his men down a tunnel to save some troopers who’ve gotten lost, including his platoon Sergeant who we later find out is Sergeant Zim from boot camp (what a crazy coincidence!)—ends with Rico getting knocked out in a tunnel collapse.
Heinlein is definitely more interested in the society he’s fashioned and the process of going through training, life aboard a military space vessel (women and men strictly separated) and all the rest. “Moral Philosophy” is the crux of the book, and Heinlein seems very much to consider himself the Moral Philosophy professor with us, dear readers, his students. No romance, very little fighting, very little space travel. It’s a little dry and a little by the book and he certainly captures what I imagine that life would be like very realistically.
Does it work? I guess it’s fine. I was more interested in the first half. The second dragged on and felt fairly repetitive. I’m all for respecting our service men and women and “support the troops” and all that, but it’s a little overly gushing when it comes to military life and the nobility of it all.
The end is just plain silly, too. Rico takes over the Roughnecks and they become Rico’s Roughnecks (good thing he had the R in his name!) and we get this final, sentimental moment. Rico’s dad—who was always against him joining up—joins up after his wife is killed when the Bugs destroy Buenos Aires and naturally he’s able to join the Roughnecks. But we forget about him for quite a while until the last page:
My platoon sergeant put his arm around my armored shoulders. “Just like a drill, Son.”
“I know it, Father.” I stopped shaking at once. “It’s the waiting, that’s all.”
“I Know. Four minutes. Shall we get buttoned up, sir?”
“Right away, Father.” I gave him a quick hug, let the Navy drop crew seal us in….
I won’t write out the rest. The point is, how did this book get so damn cheesy in the end? The Zim coincidence was already a bit much, but this whole notion that Rico is the lieutenant and his dad is his right-hand man and platoon sergeant and he calls him “Father” instead of sergeant, eh, I dunno. I found it quite jarring. Left me rolling my eyes at the end. It also sort of just drops off with very little resolution. The entire structure of the novel is very flat, not much “rising action” or really any big conflicts to resolve. An odd book.
All told, not something I’d read a second time or recommend highly, but not terrible. Not as hard to get through as A Clockwork Orange, that’s for sure. The two are quite interesting to read back-to-back as I noted in my first Starship Troopers piece. Two conservative authors writing jarringly different takes on what the future might hold. Anthony Burgess would not, I suspect, approve of Heinlein’s Utopia very much. Then again, Burgess’s dystopia is nobody’s notion of a good time.
What did you think? Let me know in the comments. We can watch the movie now and compare notes.
Book Club #3
P.S. I’ll post this in a separate post as well but Book Club #3 is going to be Dune by Frank Herbert because the movie comes out on October 22nd. I know that’s not a lot of time to get through the book—less than a month!—but we’ll do our best. I mean, why not do Dune when the movie is almost in theaters? And at least I know I like Dune so it won’t be quite the slog the last two have been.
Thanks for reading along!
The way I understood it, it's not really that the society is run by the military itself, but that you need to serve in the military in order to be granted voting rights and right to run for office. Maybe I misunderstood, but according to my reading it seemed like a very selective democracy rather than a dictatorship. The teacher in officer cadet school implied that the reason why it works is because the military (in-universe, probably not in reality) is a very selective institution that filters out those with poor moral character, or those who are too incompetent, or who have mental health issues, etc. I don't think Trump could have gained political rights in the Starship Troopers universe... I find it hard to just dismiss the idea as "too fascistic" at least, but probably there are other arguments.
I also thought the part where Rico's father suddenly shows up and has done a 180 on his view of the military was pretty stupid. The best part of the book was the boot camp section, mostly because it was funny how relatable it was. If you've been through training it's full of moments where you go "haha, yeah sergeants are really like that," or "oh yeah, seeing a woman for the first time in like a month felt exactly like that." Even so I don't (and didn't) like the military but it was nice to read a book dedicated to the virtues of the soldiering business, and that is exactly what this book was. Everything in the book is selected such that it portrays something good about the military. You might remark that it's one-sided, but sometimes there's something to be gained from listening to someone like Heinlein and (crucially) letting them finish. Afterwards, you can take from the lecture what you want, and read about anti-militarism and such as it applies to the real world instead of Heinlein's fantasy world.
A bit wider-scope, but Heinlein's writing has survived based on strength of premise, not of prose; his longform work always ends up being mostly longwinded holier-than-thou lectures about whatever bug he had up his ass while writing. His "conservative hippy" book Stranger in a Strange Land might be a fun future book-club entry based purely on the near-plasma temperature his takes would have on BOTH sides of the aisle (women are impulsive and unintelligent and require men to guide them and homosexuals are psychotic on the same level as a schizophrenic... but also nudist free-love is awesome and cannibalism is A-OK so long as you aren't killing people!)