Discussion about this post

User's avatar
anne parr's avatar

I'm quite an old person. I read the book when it first came out when I was about 18, then read it again when I was about 35. And 35 was a really long time ago.

I absolutely loved Dune Part 1. Beautiful and astonishing! Watched it on Max pre-opening day, (NOT going to a theatre anytime soon because of the virus); watched it again tonight. I think I see a whole lot more re-watching coming so long as I am subscribed to HBO.

My only (small) gripe is that, although I understand (and applaud) the reasoning of screening this film in two parts, I can only hope that I live long enough to see Part II.

Expand full comment
Muad'dib's avatar

Dune is visually spectacular, but strangely bland. It seemed to me that the writers missed all of the key themes so skillfully brought to life in Herbert's novel - Religion, Politics, Vendetta, Ecology, etc. The mentats have been reduced to nothing. Yueh's betrayal is there but it is not shocking because there is no understanding of his conditioning. And his key role in saving Paul and Jessica is not covered well at all (We see his diamond mark in the ornithopter - but if you didn't read the book I'm not sure you would understand the significance). Liet-Kynes is (so far) a throw away character. There is no real understanding of the ongoing vendetta between the two houses. Baron Harkonnen himself is only barely explored. And so it goes.... so many rich characters that are so poorly developed. I also wondered what the poor person who had not read the book would make of the plot and the many little easter eggs strewn throughout the movie. I was really hoping they could do for Dune what Peter Jackson did for LOTR, but sadly they did not achieve that. That being said - I did not hate the movie - I'd rate it 3 stars out of 5.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts